You're suggesting, then, that the artist or the creator does not have the right to decide how they're compensated. In this instance, because you're suggesting that we don't have a levy, you're suggesting that the artist doesn't have the right to decide how they're compensated for their work, that only the consumer should have that right, and still the market wouldn't change?
I could be wrong on this, and maybe there are examples, but I don't know of a lot of music CDs that actually have locks on them right now. I don't know of any. I'm sure maybe one or two exist, but overall I don't know of many that actually have them. So why must we assume that as soon as this bill is passed, there are going to be technical protection measures over everything, and that the Governor in Council or the government would simply allow that to happen and allow consumers to be shafted in the way you're suggesting?