I totally agree that the wording on that is very vague. In fact it's quite disturbing, because we've never had to take that kind of extreme measure before. We've always taken measures to make sure that users are aware of copyright and cannot abuse the system. For example, we've put up signs around photocopiers saying they must be aware there's a certain obligation on the part of the user.
My concern is the policing role we're being asked to do, which I think is beyond what we've been doing up until now. It seems to focus only on digital resources. It's not telling us we have to follow the user to the photocopy machine and make sure they only make one copy. In saying that we have to do the same in a digital environment, it looks like it's been sort of stuck in there as an afterthought, quite honestly. The same principles should apply to print as they do to digital to ensure a good way of handling copyright material.