We've heard a lot of talk about all sorts of different things that may or may not be true during the committee hearing, and I always like to go back to the facts, go back to the legislation, go back to some of the documents that are being referred to.
I would note that the Berne Convention, when it talks about reproduction rights says:
It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.
That's what the Berne Convention says. I don't think anyone would argue that this is a technical reproduction. It doesn't add value or change the music in any way. In the Berne Convention, what would prevent us from changing legislation to allow that?
We're being asked by you to change the 30-day exemption one way, by what you call a loophole.