On that one, we have looked more at commercial solutions. It would be premature for me to talk about those, because we're not prepared yet to talk about them. We have looked at them in the task force. We think there are ways of making sure that the new iteration of the Wheat Board can be successful.
But I mentioned earlier that I think one of the key components will be that there is a board that has a reason to want to make it successful. That will mean that the board will want to make sure there's a viable marketing agency for those farmers who want to use it—and there may be a lot of farmers. To me, for tonight the debate is quite simple. We have a lot of farmers who want to continue to use a marketing agency; we have farmers who want to market on their own. What we're saying is let's make sure that for those farmers who still want to do this we create something viable for them.
The FNA is prepared to be involved in that as much as possible, and we're prepared to help make sure that the new iteration of the Wheat Board, or whatever we want to call it—I don't know what we'd call it, but for simplicity's sake, CWB 2—is successful, so that farmers can use it.
We haven't seriously looked at how this could be done in legislation. We've mainly deliberated how it could be done commercially.