There would be those in the organization, Mr. Storseth, who wouldn't like your calling the FNA a company; we're a member-based organization. But I understand what you mean.
As far as pooling is concerned, if our organization were to do pooling, that would have to go along with some sort of government guarantees as well, which would be perfectly fine.
We see opportunities in pooling, in grain aggregation, in marketing and finding port positions for our members' grain, and all the things that farmers now rely on the Wheat Board for, and possibly even more. But we see those opportunities because we are a farmer member-based organization.
For those who would ask what is going to happen to the typical profits that are made in the industry, I would respond that an organization like FNA would accrue the margins back to those who would be working through the organization. So it has the empowerment aspect of a group of farmers working collectively, but it also has the benefit of accruing back whatever profits are made through that transaction and through the transportation and grain handling, et cetera. We see those opportunities.
You can start small and continue to multiply as you add more farmers, and of course that results in gaining more clout in the entire industry.