Well, I think you raise some key points.
The discussion around a service level agreement is to define performance, to find repercussions if performance standards aren't met, the performance standards that would be agreed to by a shipper and a carrier. So I think we'd look to service level agreements to define a lot of those performance metrics that were part of it.
Mr. Chairman, there were two other elements I wanted to mention. One is the grain industry supply chain and the creation of a commodity supply chain table where we will get at the important measurements of system efficiency. You know, whether we have a board going forward or not is something for you to decide, but certainly looking back, perhaps one of the questions that could be asked is what kind of vessel demurrage charges the board was paying last year. We do have transportation problems, and they need to be addressed, which is why as part of the committee we said that the rail freight service review and other elements of the March 18 announcement needed to proceed, because we needed to address some of those issues, because ultimately those costs are borne by farmers. They're not borne by the customer; they all come back to the farmers. And when we talk about a competitive industry, that's where we focus on some predictability in rail service, and supply chain efficiency was really one of the keys.
So we are looking to that suite of four initiatives announced by the government as being really key to making sure we do have some efficiency in this transition.