Thank you.
For a bit of precision, I would just have to maybe rephrase how I'm hearing the question. We don't think there's a vacuum, so I won't answer exactly what kind of vacuum will be there.
The fact of the matter is now that the grain system outside of the board works very efficiently. It could be much more efficient, and certainly Mr. Bacon will have views on that, but for the large proportion of grains that are grown, shipped, and exported in Canada, the open system works very well. As I say, it can be tightened up and it can be made more efficient, but there's all the evidence out there to suggest that in a market where you don't have competing systems of rail transport--that is, the board-administered system versus the open system--you'll have a lot more efficiencies introduced, not vacuums.
I think Murdoch can talk to you about personal experience with the Competition Bureau being very willing and proactive in moving in and making some significant decisions when it saw the potential for anti-competitive behaviour. In that regard, I think it is but one tool that we have.
There are legislative tools in the Canada Grains Act and the Canada Transportation Act that enable governments, if they want to or if they have to, to intervene--hopefully they won't. And there are a number of mechanisms by which we have transparency into how the system is working. All of those things together suggest that in an effort to have an open competitive market that is maximizing efficiency and lowering costs to farmers, especially where those costs are very high in terms of transport, the open system has that opportunity and should be given the chance to work.