On the issue of Churchill, this was discussed briefly in the committee. What was discussed much more at length was the issue of access to ports generally, not singling out any one particular port in that regard. I'll ask Murdoch Mackay to speak to that briefly.
Having said that, I do want to say that the government, as you mentioned, has spent a good deal of time looking at the challenges facing the port of Churchill. It is recognized that 90% of the grain that flows through Churchill is Wheat Board grain. It's in that context that at the time of the announcement of Bill C-18 there were really four elements to the response to Churchill: a $5 million per year incentive for the five-year transition period, to ensure the continued flow of grain for this transition period; an additional $4.1 million investment from Transport Canada for port improvements; a re-profiling, if you like, of some of the investments that have already been made and not been used in Churchill under Western Economic Diversification; and then a commitment to continue to consult with those involved with Churchill in terms of diversification and how it will work in an open market.