Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, Mr. Friesen.
You talked earlier about the FNA trying to help farmers bring stuff together, looking at all kinds of avenues, pooling where they wanted to have them do that. We are looking at this idea going forward. The government's legislation says there'll be a dual-market system. That's in their reports, in their piece that says that's what they intend to have. It's a five-year span—there's some transition. At the end of five years, if it doesn't work out, tough. See you later.
You're doing what every good soccer player does. I know Canadians love hockey, so it's always the hockey analogy. But in soccer, it's about space and where the ball is going to go, similar to what you were saying about the puck. What could be incorporated into the legislation that would enable the entity they see as CWB 2? How would that be a player in your overall viewpoint? How would it work if there were pieces of the legislation that enabled them to do what I think you're trying to suggest? That is, for those who want to pool to go ahead and do it, and for those who want to be in the open market, off you go, go and do that. It seems as though this legislation is enabling the Canadian Wheat Board in whatever incarnation it's going to be. Under this legislation, it's more likely to fail than succeed, because of the way it's been set up.