I appreciate your candour.
You pointed out, at least about the director part.... One of the questions I raised earlier with Mr. Knubley and Mr. Meredith was about the whole idea that the basic ministerial appointments of five directors, who are, for all intents and purposes, directors at the whim of the minister and the Governor in Council, and who will take direction from the minister and implement the directions whenever they're given—assuming that they are given, which I expect they would be, because there's a whole.... The legislation talks about all the pieces the minister will approve—the minister will approve this, the minister will approve that, and on and on it goes.
My sense is that this board of directors isn't functioning necessarily to the benefit of farmers who want to pool, but on the whim of a minister who decides which direction he wants to go in.
From your viewpoint—and I know you haven't looked at the legislation from the perspective of what you would do—do you see any merits to maintaining some process of election of directors for those who want to pool, rather than having absolutely the entire board appointed?