Also, to help them to cope with what you call the far-reaching implications of doing away with the Canadian Wheat Board. I'm glad you came here with concrete recommendations as to how producers might cope. All of your ideas were cost factors. All of your ideas called for government spending to help them cope. This is what's unknown to us. The total cost of this free market flight of fancy of Mr. Anderson's here is untested, unproved, and open-ended. It's a blank cheque they're asking us to write just to fulfill this, as I say, life's ambition, this dream of theirs to abolish the Wheat Board.
I believe everything you have recommended and said to us has merit in helping producers cope with the implications. All of them were cost factors. We heard KPMG estimate $500 million in hard costs just to close up this $6 billion per year corporation. What you're suggesting is there's going to have to be a lot more spending, or else we're going to lose producers. Has your analysis of the implications of this bill led you to believe some producers will in fact leave the family farm as a result? Will small producers be affected to that extent?