I want to get back to the rail freight service review just very quickly, because the legislation that is proposed under the rail freight service review is really to lay out a process. But that doesn't retard shippers, the Wheat Board, or anyone from working on the service review and actually completing that. We've seen lots of that happen. I'm very disappointed that the Wheat Board hasn't exercised that opportunity. When it comes to the Wheat Board, and from analysis of what has been said here, I know my colleague has said that under a dual marketing system you have $450 million to $628 million more at the farm gate for farmers. So if we look at it that way, then actually farmers are subsidizing the Wheat Board to that degree every year right now. That's something that needs to take place here.
My colleagues are saying we don't have any representation by farmers. I would suggest that everyone here on this side represents a very strong farming area, and many of us are a lot closer than that to it. But when it comes to a question that I get from a number of farmers, I think this is a technical question that I'd like you to focus in on. It's the producer car. We have had some angst about producer cars. A number of farmers are wondering if they are still going to be able to order their producer cars and how that is going to actually work in the system.
Can you comment on what you found as a working group with regard to producer cars?