Mr. Chairman, on a point of order, I thought, as I understood the parliamentary secretary, that the agreement we had tacitly put in place was that we would go through those clauses for which there are no amendments and deal with them, and then, when we hit a clause on which there is an amendment, we'd deal with it at that time.
It's not our intention to dispense with every clause that has no amendment and then come back and do the clauses, for the simple reason that there's an order, a systematic order, and some continuity associated with the bill as we walk through the various issues. For instance, we'd be bouncing back and forth from representation, etc.