For clause 6, there is a proposed amendment.
Again, I have the same ruling here, put to me by the legislative clerk: if clause 3 is adopted, then NDP motion 2 cannot be put to the table, as it is inconsistent with an earlier decision that was taken as a result of clause 3, which was inconsistent because of the decision taken on clause 2.... Rather than read that same ruling into the record, I will have to rule that amendment NDP-2 is inconsistent and therefore cannot be brought forward, so I'll call the question on clause 6.
Shall clause 6 carry? On division?