I've heard your comments. That wasn't my understanding of the agreement. My understanding was that we would dispense with the clauses on which there was agreement, in the sense that there were no proposed amendments, and then would go back and test the committee's will when it came to the amendments that were tabled. I'm operating on that presumption.
Mr. Martin, you're now saying that you didn't have that same presumption. Does that mean we no longer have consensus to proceed in that way?