I have one last question on this point, then. If that is the case, and the directors can't be sued—they're protected under the act—and they do not act in the duty of care--and I would question whether some of the current appointed directors are--then what recourse does the farm community have? If a member doesn't operate with the duty of care, yet he's protected against being sued and the minister, for whatever reason, has appointed a friend and won't fire him, what's the recourse that farmers have against this agency?
On November 3rd, 2011. See this statement in context.