Thank you for that intervention, but again I'm confused. On page 16 of this little missive, it sounds to me like you're giving testimony here that you met with the government, Mr. Baird or others, before the act was tabled in the House. And yet--the language is very clear to me--on page 16 you say, “It is regrettable that the new government did not consult with the Information Commissioner with respect to the need for, or the wording of, the 12 new exemptions....”
Before the bill was tabled, did you have a general consultation or a specific one, or somewhere in between?