I'm not sure I'm in a position to comment, because you rather framed it around an environment that is political. I would suggest to you that if the mechanism is there to bring in amendments to the legislation, then absolutely, I would have to agree with the comments you've made. It's difficult not to.
The concern we have is that once you build this legislation and pass it, you now have a framework, and policies have to now fit within that framework. That's our concern: what would it take then? I understand that when you're going to go.... The review is there after five years, but I think you need to probably look at the thing on an annual basis.
I wouldn't want to see you get into a fairly bureaucratic process to make adjustments to the bill, where you find flaws over time because you're looking in the mirror and realize we have to make these types of fundamental changes. Our concern really is that once you pass this legislation, the box has already been formed at that point. You've laid down the foundation, and what policies can be fit in there have to fit within that framework.
That's why we're saying you need to bring in the stakeholders and give them time to digest this. We're not talking about years here.