Up until your being here as a witness today, I think the emphasis of this committee has probably been on the access to information side. Your representing the side for right to privacy is very fitting.
With the whistle-blowing changes, you cite that you don't oppose what Bill C-2 would do to Bill C-11. But in your own experience, I suppose it's ultimately very difficult to guarantee the anonymity of the whistle-blower. I think you made some reference to it. If it becomes an integral part of the investigation, you talked about natural justice or maintaining natural justice. Could you explain what you mean by that?
I'll find the phrase:
Even where the identity of the whistleblower may be relevant to an investigation, Bill C-11, as amended by C-2, expressly provides that rules of procedural fairness and natural justice continue to apply....
What do you mean by natural justice and procedural fairness?