I would argue, sir, that in fact it is enacted, and that's why it is taking up 50 pages of the bill.
You may argue that it doesn't go far enough and that there are amendments. That's a fair argument, but to make a blanket statement that we have broken a promise by not enshrining the conflict of interest code into this act is completely unfounded. It's a false claim, but we will argue that and perhaps agree to disagree.
Let me go on to another one. You accused the government of breaking its promise to close loopholes that allow ministers to vote on matters connected with their business interests.
Please turn to page 6 and read me proposed subsection 6(2).