Yes, it was.
I'll answer in English, if that's okay. My English is a little bit better than my French.
I think it can really be blocked into sort of three major themes, and I think the overriding theme of every amendment we are suggesting has at the heart of it that public information belongs to the public and that the burden of proof must be carried by those who would deem to keep information secret. That should really be the overriding theme as we look through this. Cabinet confidences fall into that theme; public interest override falls into that theme. Then there are things that are more administrative in nature but are still critical to ensuring that the Access to Information Act works smoothly.
I think at the core, again, is that the right to know is so critical to a democracy that when we have a system that is clearly outdated and has not seen any substantive reform in over twenty years, there are clearly some problems. The duty to keep records is one that is a huge problem, particularly in this information age in which record-keeping is not what it used to be. BlackBerry devices and what not are taking over, and if we don't have any records of those decisions and of that information, there's going to be a real gap in terms of understanding how policy gets made in this country.