That's right, yes.
I wouldn't mind also very briefly commenting on the Public Appointments Commission, because it's a lightning rod for what's wrong with this bill, and what I guess your amendment is trying to do—and I hope there are a lot of other amendments—to make this constructive.
But I would go further. I would say that commission has to be independent, selected by Parliament, and also covered under the Access to Information Act. I have a briefing note from the Public Service Commission that says in the United Kingdom one of the commissioners is a public service commissioner, because they at least have some experience in what merit appointments should be, and also that the appointments commission should be more transparent.
In B.C., the information commissioner is selected. Three people are brought before a legislative committee, who look at the appointment and then decide. They don't just put forward a PM appointee and that's it. It's a real, transparent situation.