If the choice is a true choice, an equal choice with equal access to remedies and with equal access to action on the part of the tribunal, board, or whatever, to ensure that the retaliator knows its actions were wrong, then why would we be opposed to choice?
There may be some issue in terms of appropriate use of resources. The member from the Bloc caucus was mentioning the duplication between federal jurisdiction and provincial jurisdiction. I think we want to make sure our tax dollars are spent efficiently, and before we set up parallel tribunals we should make sure it would be done in such a way that resources are not wasted.