I've been extremely patient in listening to Mr. Sauvageau go wildly off topic here. We are discussing an amendment from Mr. Martin, and I would hope that we could stay on that topic. Mr. Sauvageau has spent the last five minutes debating remarks unrelated to this amendment, that occurred prior to the existence of this amendment and therefore could not possibly be germane to this amendment that is up for discussion right now. Though his speech might have some eloquence, it has no pertinence.
On May 31st, 2006. See this statement in context.