I'm sure it's judicious.
My question is for Ms. Aloïsi. In Bill C-2, no mention is made of the complaints filed with the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, ruled admissible and in respect of which the Department of Public Works and Government Services is found guilty—I don't know whether you can use that word—of wrongdoing in the case of a contract.
I'm referring to a Globe & Mail article published on May 31, referring to a decision by the Canadian Foreign Trade Tribunal to the effect that there appears to have been wrongdoing in the Envoy case and in relocation cases with Royal LePage.
Can you tell us whether those decisions, once made public, should be subject to an investigation under Bill C-2 through the Integrity Commissioner, or whether they should be abandoned, as is currently the case? Is my question clear enough?