In the introduction of your report it is stated that:
The executive branch should never have legal control of the legislative branch (the House or the Senate). Otherwise, there would be no effective difference between a Parliament with a majority government and one with a minority government and the constitutional function of the House of holding the government to account would be a nullity. The House's legal autonomy is sustained through the application of long-standing principles of parliamentary law which are generally described by the term “parliamentary privilege” and form part of the constitutional law of Canada.
Further on, you state:
Some provisions in Bill C-2 seem to run contrary to the constitutional position of the House. These are provisions that [...]
You then go on to list the provisions in question. You state that Bill C-2 has an effect on the balance between parliamentary privilege and parliamentary tradition.