I agree with what has just been said. The thing that troubles me is that we are in a Parliament where you're entitled to ask a question of a minister. The minister said two things. I wanted to know the answer to the simple question of whether he felt it was constitutional. His first answer was, well, we can override it anyway, and his second answer was that it is constitutional. I'd just like to know. Maybe the minister could help his members over there to propose which amendment they want to do. Do you want to take away the privileges of Parliament or not? Then we can deal with one of the two amendments.
I'd like some direction from the government. It's unclear to me. Given what the minister and the parliamentary secretary said here today, it would seem to me that they're leaning toward taking away parliamentary privileges. If Mr. Moore would assist in telling us which direction they're going in, maybe we can avoid Mr. Toews' appearance.
That's my two bits.