Yes, I am sorry.
There is very little difference regarding the changes made by Bill C-2, because the Public Service Labour Relations Board already exists and the reasons invoked by the government do not justify the delay in implementing these protections.
It is therefore clear that Bill C-11 would be completely eliminated after the application of Bill C-2, but from a legislative perspective, it is doable, realistic and would not be overly problematic. We will see a little later on what the will of the various stakeholders is.
My second question deals with another area. I have not yet studied Bill C-2 thoroughly enough to be able to answer this question. Could certain decisions of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal be subject to Bill C-2?
Let us suppose, for example, that a department puts out a call for tenders, that a company or organization is chosen, but that another organization realizes that the call for tenders was biased, skewed—think of Earnscliffe, at the time, for example—and that the other competitors working in the field realize that there is a problem, that they take the case to the Canadian Trade Tribunal and that they win their case alleging that the call for tender was biased.
Could this decision be subject to Bill C-2, when it becomes law, that is to say the decision to investigate the bad administration in the case of the competitive bidding?