I'll just take the brief time on a little question about your comment that the bill is intended to significantly reduce the role of money in politics. Combined with your comment that this is really about the executive, not the legislative, and you're open to going wherever the committee might suggest, I wonder whether election cap spending, on the other side of the argument about how much money can be donated, might be considered. Do you consider that too widespread?
I also want your brief comment on the role of PACs, action committees outside of government to influence elections, if we really want to significantly reduce the role of money in politics, which I think was your wording.