All right.
To further clarify Mr. Murphy's questioning, the additional independence that exists here is that the public can see the independence.
Right now, Mr. Wild, you have affirmed the overall independence of the prosecutorial function of the Attorney General's office, but we operate on a take-our-word-for-it basis. There is no way for Joe Citizen living in Halifax or Red Deer or Nepean to really know 100% what involvement the Attorney General has had in adjusting the behaviour or decisions of the prosecution within that department, whereas if we bring in the changes that sever the two offices and create the Director of Public Prosecutions, any direction that the Attorney General would want to give to the Director of Public Prosecutions would have to be done in writing and be made public, so that any involvement or political interference whatsoever would have to be known by Joe and Jane Public.
Is that not an accurate description of the distinction between the status quo and the DPP?