So right now, as a member of Parliament, I personally don't know to what extent an Attorney General is directing the decisions of the federal prosecutor and I have no way of knowing that. Conceivably, I guess I could file an ATI request to see if there is any written correspondence, but I really don't have any way of knowing, as a member of the public. But if we create a Director of Public Prosecutions, who takes the same staff and the same expertise, and we just separate it, we are ensuring that any political tampering whatsoever or any attempt by the executive branch of government to influence the decisions of the federal prosecutor will have to be made known to the public and be done in writing in a transparent fashion.
In this sense, independence comes from transparency. As Pat Martin has often said, transparency is the sunlight that acts as the detergent. We agree with him on that. That is the reason that we on this side believe there ought to be that transparency in every step of federal prosecution.
Those are some comments and technical clarifications that I wanted to make.
Is there anyone else on the Conservative side who would like to conclude our time? I see none, so that would be all from our side.