So people who believe in the independence of the judiciary must also logically believe that an independent tribunal of judges, comprised, when need be, to protect whistle-blowers and to discipline those who have bullied whistle-blowers, is necessary if you really believe in independence. I'm not going to ask you to comment on that, because I'm just making a point.
So I hope the opposition members will find it in their hearts to extend that kind of independent protection by judges, as opposed to protection by politicians and senior bureaucrats, who in some cases may themselves have been involved in the initial wrongdoing, to provide those protections.
That's exactly what the Accountability Act does. It is a fundamental change, is it not, from Bill C-11? Regardless of whether one supports the policy decision or not to give independent protection through judges, would you not agree that it is a fairly quintessential change from the system that was in place under Bill C-11?