It is suggested in some circles that any reference to former judges, council members and so on be deleted. However, even though we're talking about a quasi-judicial body here, you'll see that the judgments, once rendered, will be entirely judicial in nature. We'll all be subject to this act, I believe. In the event of a problem, we would want to ensure that the person responsible for making the judgment has clearly understood the situation in legal terms.
Then it is suggested that a former judge or former member of a board be asked. I believe that what Mr. Martin explained before his amendment was correct: we shouldn't eliminate candidates. But we are eliminating everyone. Then we'll have to call on anyone. In some cases, that could cause a problem. So I suggest, since this is a very important act, that we appoint highly qualified people so that you will have full confidence in their decisions.