It's more or less as the legislative clerk has set out.
If on L-2.2 that motion passes, what it would do to clause 38 is pretty dramatic. It would basically eliminate clause 38, which causes us several technical problems around the different items that are dealt with in clause 38.
Of course it's up to the committee, and I can't speak to what the committee will do, but obviously our preference would be to be given the opportunity to draft an appropriate amendment to ensure that everything works properly, so that the consideration of clause 38 would be, in essence, tabled until we could get that amendment drafted and the appropriate notice provided.