The point of order is that even from your instructions, when an amendment has been proposed, and a subsequent amendment is proposed that is either identical or would automatically be deleted or rejected because the first amendment is adopted, we would like you to clearly state that for the transcripts.
So for instance, we just adopted a Liberal motion for an amendment. There was a subsequent NDP amendment that was identical. Madame Guay is simply requesting that before you move on to another amendment, you clearly state for the record that the NDP amendment falls because of the adoption of the previous one. That's all.