Yes. Thank you, Mr. Wild.
That was my observation too, a concern that it isn't really clear, or it wasn't clear to me what would be caught up by this in proposed section 52, because proposed section 52 as it stands refers to subsection 22(1), proposed sections 23, 24, 25, 26; it doesn't talk about proposed subsection 52(1). Or is it referring to...?
Would it be your understanding that if we passed BQ-6, proposed section 52 would then have proposed subsections 52(1) and (2), and the proposed subsection that Mr. Sauvageau is putting forward is referring to proposed subsection 52(1)?