Mr. Chairman, the “and/or” is a bit of an unusual method from a technical drafting perspective. In order to capture the basis of the language, I could certainly suggest that if we rewrote it, sticking with the language as we have it now in the amendments, we'd be talking about:
The commissioner shall conduct an investigation if he or she has reason to believe, including on the basis of information received from a member of the Senate or the House of Commons....
We would then continue. If that captures the principle, it would be a method of doing it.