Okay. Then would Mr. Owen's amendment, if adopted, capture scenario one, the hypothetical situation I've just given, in which an individual is conducting lobbyist activities but has not registered under the Lobbyists Registration Act, as prescribed under the act right now—and even as prescribed under Bill C-2, once it comes into force—and therefore is not in compliance with the act? Would Mr. Owen's amendment, if adopted, capture that type of scenario?
On June 12th, 2006. See this statement in context.