Thank you.
I take that comment very seriously, but I wonder in passing why someone who was perhaps in a position of great influence before the election, as the policy chief to the leader of the opposition, could now be a lobbyist. What about filling that loophole? They could be a lobbyist for the telecommunications, energy, and transportation industry. Does that not offend the sensibility that you're suggesting as well?
I'd like to get an explanation of the impact of amendment G-32 on page 69, subsection 88.1(2) of that, as it relates to this amendment.