So we're not trying to remain constant with some....
My feeling is that you want one of these appointments to bridge a parliamentary cycle. I think that's advantageous, so I see where Mr. Sauvageau is coming from.
It currently reads “not greater than three years”. Is that what I am to understand? I'm wondering if we should have a subamendment to have “not greater than five years”, that would satisfy the idea the appointment could be as long as five years to bridge at least one parliamentary cycle, but not to be held in the same status as an officer of Parliament, at seven years.
So I'd like to move that as a subamendment.