I understand. I am going to interrupt you for a second.
If Bill C-11 had been enacted and had complaints being lodged, under the interim provision, the complaints you were already seized with would have been affected. From what you are saying, there would have been enhanced protection for whistleblowers. Let me speculate for a moment: once adopted, Bill C-2 will amend Bill C-11, which is already in effect. It is being claimed that Bill C-2 provides even better protection than Bill C-11.
I do not understand what would happen at that point. It may be necessary to include interim provisions in Bill C-11 to ensure there is no legal void and that the procedures permitted under Bill C-11, once enacted, would be either maintained or abolished in Bill C-2. I really cannot see what the problem is.