That's an interesting point, because some other officers of Parliament take the opposite view, thinking that a secret ballot would be better. But that's something where there will probably always be 50% of the people on one side of the question and 50% on the other.
My question, though, Ms. Adam, is that some critics of this bill hone in on the access to information and say we're making it more secretive. So I would just like you to explain, if you could, a little bit more fully why you're recommending that we include yet another exemption to access to information under the Privacy Act, and why, if all access to information was increased, it would undermine the integrity of your office. Why are you asking for more exemptions to access to information?