If I could answer that question, it appears to be a choice, but I'm not sure it is.
First of all, I understand what you're saying about the fact that the tribunal is established to be staffed with judges who are obviously highly legally competent individuals.
To give a little perspective on this in terms of how it really works for our members, the courts themselves and the same judges who would be appointed to this tribunal constantly defer to the expertise of labour relations boards. It is a standard feature of a judicial review of a decision from a labour relations board to have the judges say they're not going to interfere in this or overturn it because they feel this board has the expertise. The intersection between that and the way in which wrongdoing actually plays out, and is experienced by our members in the workplace, is that reprisal and wrongdoing are very often done in ways that either touch on or really directly use articles of the collective agreement. I, as a wrongdoer, am a little bit worried that you, as a worker, might speak out against me, so I'm going to start docking your hours and I'm going to start playing with your vacation and I'm going to start doing things, all of which involve the collective agreement. Or maybe, if I'm setting up a scam, I'll encourage you to file false overtime and give me a cut of it. All of those things have happened and have been dealt with by the labour relations board already; they are scenarios in which the labour relations board has real expertise.