With respect to cash donations, there already is a requirement that there be a receipt for any amount over $20. This would have, then, a double protection, in the sense that no contribution could be made in cash any more--it would have to be through a traceable instrument--but the requirement to provide a receipt would also be maintained.
In effect, the bill introduces a further safeguard against cash donations finding their way into the system, while protecting something that I consider to be reasonable, which is the ability at a particular meeting to pick up $20 per person from those in the room--the passing-of-the-hat phenomenon.
I can only say that this double protection I view in a favourable light and I personally don't think--even though you may have a different view--it will add an extra burden that is not worth its weight.