I just wanted to caution that the process for whistle-blowers needs to be simple and straightforward; it cannot be convoluted. Already it's difficult for members to come forward, to build up the courage to blow the whistle on any kind of situation. There has to be a clear path in front of them that they're comfortable with. To me, to have choices already makes it a little bit more convoluted.
In addition to that, the board currently would not be a choice, for example, for damage for pain and suffering because they don't have that authority. So they would have to go to the tribunal. So it would not be a choice.