Again, maybe you can be of some help. We're planning on putting in an amendment under this section of the bill to deal with floor crossing. We view it as an irritant that a lot of Canadians are concerned about. We're finding your rulings helpful on a couple of complaints that have been made, actually, in that your rulings pretty much cited that if the floor crossing could have been tied to some personal gain or tied directly to an actual vote in the House of Commons, then not only could it be viewed that it was an ethical breach, but it could also even be viewed that the person may have been induced with some monetary or....
I have two questions. Could you expand on that one a little bit? Also, do you see that personal interest could be something other than monetary gain, such as status or career laddering? Do you see other ways of taking a more generous interpretation of personal interest?