I'm going to support this request because it's time-limited. We're talking about four meetings, from May 29 to June 2. Nothing else is being added.
If I understood correctly, we would supposedly reach clause-by-clause consideration after that. There may be some doubt, but we're only talking about four new meetings. That's no big deal.
I had asked Mr. Poilievre to suggest to the opposing party—sorry, it's an old habit—to sit during the break week. I was told that was impossible because everyone was busy.
I was willing to do that. We would have followed the same schedule with ease. But now, we're going on vacation, indirectly, and adding four meetings. That's why I would support the decision.