Part of the interest here is that, as accountability is becoming a more important issue nationally, this is a first nations accommodation, if you will, to what seems to be a national interest. At the same time, it's respecting the idea that was described within The Harvard Project, which talks about the cultural match for institutions, that we not simply take institutions, apply them, and expect success. We've seen that this does not work.
This is a way to look at accountability, to look at all the elements of accountability that are necessary to have appropriate capacity, provided and funded at the local level, and to provide for some of the standards and tools to measure that accountability. This would be part of an overall process and overall plan that we see as being important. I would point out that it's not one single element.
So we don't see it in conflict. We see it as a way of evolving it to be consistent with Canada's agenda but to be parallel and distinct and appropriate with that agenda.