That still doesn't answer my question, which is that should Mr. Moore's amendment to this motion for notice of motion be adopted, and then the motion itself, the main motion as amended, be adopted, then if at any point in the future this committee is dealing with business, is considering certain business obviously directly related to Bill C-2--that's the business and main mandate of this committee--and someone attempts to table a motion without the hours' notice, whether we decide that's going to be 48 hours', 24 hours', 36 hours', 35 hours', 23 hours' notice, or whatever--
On October 30th, 2007. See this statement in context.