I want to be part of this debate. Mr. Moore's motion may not be in the interests of the committee's work. I also think that 48 hours may not work for the committee, in the sense that the kind of motion that we would like to table might involve matters that the committee is dealing with right then, like adding witnesses or other questions like that. Since we may find ourselves sitting three times a week, could 48 hours notice not be an obstacle for the committee's work? I would like to change it from 48 hours to 24 hours, but I do not want us to vote on Mr. Moore's motion. I think that we have to ask ourselves what kind of motion we want the committee to deal with. I think that 48 hours notice could be an obstacle, unless someone can give me examples that are not occurring to me. I do not want us to vote on Mr. Moore's amendment.
On October 30th, 2007. See this statement in context.